24 November 2009 

 

 Welcome to 

 No. 123 in the series  

Contents

1. Rotterdam Rules - status of signatures and ‘instruments’

2. Montreal Convention 1999 - increase of liability limit from 17 SDR to 19 SDR per kg

3. Crane Safety - towards a baseline standard

4. Conclusion

 

1. Rotterdam Rules - status of signatures and ‘instruments’

As is now widely known in the industry, 16 countries signed the Rotterdam Rules at the signing ceremony of 23 September 2009. By 26 October 2009, the number of signatures increased to 21 countries.

The Rotterdam Rules will enter into force one year after ‘the twentieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession’ hence signing up to the Rules is a precursor to such ratification, acceptance or approval (countries which are not signatory states can directly accede to the Rules).

Thus, the real counting will start with the first instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. As the Secretary-General of the United Nations is the depositary of the Rotterdam Rules, we recommend that Rotterdam Rules aficionados use the following UN web link for the latest status:

http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XI-D-8&chapter=11&lang=en

Incidentally, the TT Club is running a series of presentations on the Rotterdam Rules for Members and brokers at key locations around the world. These presentations aim to generate a clearer understanding of the impact the Rotterdam Rules might have. The first two of these presentations have been held in London and Hong Kong and taken together have attracted more than 100 delegates.  

 

2. Montreal Convention 1999 - increase of liability limit from 17 SDR to 19 SDR per kg

a) Montreal Convention 1999

By the end of 2009 the liability limit for cargo in Art 22(3) of the Montreal Convention 1999 for international carriage by air will increase from 17 SDR to 19 SDR per kilogram. A SDR (Special Drawing Right) currently equals about USD 1.60.

The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), who is the depositary of the Montreal Convention 1999, stated that this increase would enter into force six months after the ICAO notification of 30 June 2009 (whether the precise date is the 30 Dec 2009, 31 Dec 2009 or 1 Jan 2010 is maybe not entirely clear).

The reason for this increase from 17 SDR to 19 SDR per kilogram is the ‘escalator clause’ in Art 24(1) of the Montreal Convention 1999, which requires ICAO as depositary to review the liability limits in this convention at five-year intervals. The increase from 17 SDR to 19 SDR per kilogram is said to reflect inflation of 13.1% over that period (this figure is apparently based on the IMF world economic outlook database).

This increase from 17 SDR to 19 SDR per kilogram will apply only under the Montreal Convention 1999, i.e. to air carriage contracts where the Montreal Convention 1999 is in force in both the country of departure and destination. The TT Club Conventions Handbook, which was published a few months ago, explains the plethora of air carriage conventions and contains the table ‘Carriage conventions per country’.

b) IATA air waybill form

The Conditions of Contract in the IATA air waybill set the global industry standard. They are based on IATA Resolution 600b, which currently includes a limit of 17 SDR. Any revision of IATA Resolution 600b has to be approved at an IATA Cargo Service Conference (CSC) and authorised by government authorities, such as the US Department of Transport DOT. It is unlikely that this process will already be completed when the new limit of 19 SDR comes into force at the end of 2009, yet IATA advised its members (the vast majority of the world’s airlines) to continue using, for the time being, Resolution 600b in its current version of 17 March 2008. It is expected that the new IATA Conditions of Contract will become available in the first half of 2010.

c) Transport Operators’ house air waybills and standard trading conditions

For Transport Operators (freight forwarders) who assume liability as contracting air carriers under their own house air waybills, the Club strongly recommended in TT Talk Edition 108 (of 30 May 2008) the use of the IATA air waybill form based on IATA Resolution 600b, supplemented at the bottom of the air waybill back with the following FIATA recommended ‘Note’:

‘If this air waybill is used by a forwarder in a capacity as contracting carrier for air transportation, any transportation or other service which is not subject to an international air carriage convention will not be subject to the terms and conditions of this air waybill but will instead be subject to the forwarder's general conditions as have already been provided to you.’

In addition to including this ‘Note’ in its house air waybill, the Transport Operator must of course validly incorporate its general conditions to which this ‘Note’ refers.

This recommended approach is not affected by the increase to 19 SDR per kilogram under the Montreal Convention 1999. While the current version of IATA Resolution 600b with its liability limit of 17 SDR per kg will not comply with the new liability limit of 19 SDR under the Montreal Convention 1999, it is believed that this is tolerable for what is likely to be a transitional period of a few months only.

Naturally, the liability limit of 19 SDR per kilogram in the Montreal Convention 1999 has compulsory force of law and will therefore simply override lower limits in contractual documents such as house air waybills or standard trading conditions. Transport Operators might therefore want to review the limit of liability for air carriage in their standard trading conditions; in any case, Members should be reminded of the importance of a clause which states that any provision in the standard trading conditions shall be overridden to the extent that it conflicts with compulsory legislation, but no further.

The TT Club is happy to assist its Members with any enquires in connection with the increase of the Montreal Convention liability limit to 19 SDR per kg. In any case, Members are advised to keep their stock of current air waybills at suitably low levels.  

3. Crane Safety - towards a baseline standard

In a concerted effort to reduce injuries and equipment damage in port operations, the TT Club, the Port Equipment Manufacturers Association (PEMA) and ICHCA International have announced a joint initiative to establish minimum safety standards for quayside container cranes. There are many features available for the design of quay container cranes which can dramatically improve safety, reducing exposure to injury, damage and disruption costs. The initiative aims to ensure that such features are included as standard and not optional in specifications tendered by equipment manufacturers.

TT Club has an established reputation for researching, assessing and nurturing technological advances that will enhance safety and performance in the operational port environment. In the past TT has recommended, for example, the installation of boom anti-collision sensors, which have proven benefits in preventing damage costs and business disruption, as well as improving safety for crane operators, terminal personnel and ships’ crews.

Port Equipment Manufacturers Association (PEMA) President, Ottonel Popesco said, ‘The issue that the project seeks to address is developing a benchmarked minimum standard safety specification for quayside container cranes. This may include issues such as boom anti-collision sensors, appropriate interlocking and gate locks between the crane cabin and boom, safe stairway inclines and handrail heights, gantry drive and braking systems, storm brakes, storm pins and tie-downs. Just like seat belts in cars, critical safety features should be standard and not optional. As part of PEMA’s mission to support and contribute to best practice initiatives, we hope that this project will make a valuable contribution to our industry and our customers by defining common guidelines for quay crane safety features.’

John Strang, the Chairman of ICHCA International, added his backing to the project, ‘Inevitably, crane procurement is price sensitive and requires significant budget. However, buyers will not always be familiar with the most effective safety technologies. Furthermore, the process of specification is complex; any quote needs to be carefully assessed against the invitation to tender, and subsequent change requests can be costly. For all these reasons, there should be a standard safe baseline provided in every tender to ensure the industry has the safest cranes possible. This issue is not restricted to quay container cranes; it is equally relevant for other cranes and other terminal equipment. Our long term aim is to establish international and national baseline safety standards for all terminal equipment.’

Initial work will involve agreeing the list of safety features that should be standard. Thereafter. the partners will seek a commitment from all quayside container crane suppliers on the baseline standard specification in relation to safety that will be used in tendering.

4. Conclusion

We hope that you will have found the above items interesting. If you would like to have further information about any of them, or have any comments you would like to make, please email the editor at tt.talk@ttclub.com. We look forward to hearing from you.

Peter Stockli

Editor

for the TT Club

TT Talk is a free electronic newsletter published as occasion demands, by the TT Club, 90 Fenchurch Street, London, EC3M 4ST, United Kingdom.

You can also read this newsletter and past issues on our website: http://www.ttclub.com

If you do not wish to receive future editions, please reply to this message and include the word ‘REMOVE’ in the subject line. If you have received this edition via someone else and you would like your own personal copy in future, please send your name, company name and e-mail address to:

tt.talk@ttclub.com

The materials contained in TT Talk have been prepared for information purposes only, and are not a substitute for legal advice. Whilst every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the materials, the editor, any contributor or the TT Club accept no responsibility for loss or damage which may arise from reliance on information contained in TT Talk.

For Company Registration Information please click below

http://www.thomasmiller.com/companyinfo




To guarantee delivery of this email please add t.t.club@cmp.dotmailer.co.uk to your address book and safe senders list.

TT Talk is a free electronic newsletter published as occasion demands, by the TT Club
© 2008 TT Club
    
90 Fenchurch Street
London
EC3M 4ST
United Kingdom

Click here to Unsubscribe