|
|
|||
|
TRADE
PRACTICES |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Jail Terms for Cartel Conduct – TPA
Amendments Passed |
|||
|
Thursday,
18 June 2009 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
The Trade
Practices Amendment (Cartel Conduct and Other Measures) Bill was passed
by the Senate on Monday night. Despite hopes that
there would be material changes to the joint venture defence provisions, the
only changes from the version of the Bill already passed by the House of
Representatives were largely inconsequential. These revisions will almost
certainly be passed by the House of Representatives next week. The result is
that jail terms of up to 10 years jail for cartel conduct will be law from
early August. Comments from
Marcus Bezzi, the ACCC's head of enforcement, to a competition law conference
last month on the ACCC’s intended approach to criminal prosecutions make
interesting reading: ...if the
tests under the Prosecution Policy of the Commonwealth are satisfied, it
should be clear to everyone that the ACCC will always support a criminal
prosecution. For the
legal representatives of people who are being investigated this means that
there will be no point trying to negotiate resolution of a serious cartel
matter in the way that may have been done when civil proceedings were the
only available option. The ACCC will simply not negotiate with you when a
criminal prosecution is available for such conduct. We will never allow the
prospect of a criminal prosecution to be traded away by an attractive offer
for resolution of civil penalty proceedings. For serious
cartel conduct, we would only be willing to commence negotiations for a
resolution of an investigation through a civil penalty proceeding after the
possibility of a criminal prosecution has been ruled out. It remains to be
seen whether the ACCC will be able to cope in practice with the work load
that will result from adopting a strict policy of prosecuting all 'serious'
matters as criminal prosecutions. Unfair
Contract Law – Bill due next week New national
unfair contract rules will be introduced to Parliament next week. From the
start of next year, these will render any 'unfair' term in any standard form
business or consumer contract liable to be declared void. For more details,
see our 12 May E’news The Bill will
then go to the Senate, where it will be referred to the Senate Economics
Committee for review. Anyone
concerned about this new legislation should be sharpening their pens now to
put submissions in to Senate Committee review process as soon as it opens.
Let us know if you would like any help putting submissions together. New ACCC
Civil Penalty Provisions The same Bill
which introduces the new national unfair contract laws is also expected to
introduce civil penalties for breaches of the consumer protection provisions
of the Trade Practices Act (TPA). The TPA
already includes criminal offence provisions for conduct such as misleading
representations. However, prosecution under these provisions requires proof
to a criminal standard, so for a number of years the ACCC has generally put
it in the "too hard" basket. Prosecution
under the new civil penalty provisions will easier for the ACCC as it will
only require proof to a ‘balance of probabilities’ standard and will not
require liaison with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions. As a
result, expect to see more prosecutions from the ACCC for breaches of
consumer protection rules from the second half of this year. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If you have
any questions, please contact one of our partners named below. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Richard Westmoreland |
Robert Gardini |
Peter van Rompaey |
|
|
(02) 9334 8717 |
(02) 9334 8619 |
(03) 8633 7506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne Jenvey |
Steve Burns |
|
|
|
(07) 3020 2801 |
(02) 9334 8841 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
If you do not
wish to receive further e-Alerts from our Trade Practices Group, please reply
‘remove’ to this email. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
hwlebsworth.com.au |
||